
HOW MUCH DOG WASTE IS PRODUCE IN ONE
YEAR IN THE UNITED STATES?
4.4 billion pounds
of dog waste is produced every year in the
United States alone! This is equal to 900 football
fields, one foot high. This is a hidden health
issue that no one wants to "touch" as
approximately 71,542,900 registered
dogs in the United States produce more than
29,000 tons of waste daily. There are 48,143,849
dog owners in the United States.
EPA Clean Water Act of 1998 has deemed that animal waste or feces
as secondary storm runoff contaminate.
Many communities are implementing pet waste management programs
by hiring a professional canine waste management service,
making available pet waste management products,
posting signs in parks or other pet frequented
areas, sending mailings, and
making public service announcements.
Many communities have "pooper-scooper" laws that govern
pet waste cleanup.
MYTH:
Dog feces safely disintegrates into the soil.
FACT:
-Dog feces left on your lawn can pose a serious
health hazard!
-It can take up to 1 year
for dog feces to break down.
-Dog feces is protein based and is poisonous
to lawns.
-Dog waste poses threat to water
Dog waste poses threat to water
By Traci Watson, USA TODAY
Cities struggle with 'dog piles' Where they're cracking down:
For
as long as the dog has been man's best friend, dog waste has posed
a menace to man's nose and foot. Now science has revealed a more
unsavory truth: It's an environmental pollutant.
In the mid-1990s, scientists perfected methods for tracking the
origin of nasty bacteria in streams and seawater. From Clearwater,
Fla., to Arlington, Va., to Boise the trail has led straight to the
hunched-up dog — and to owners who don't pick up after their
pets.
At some beaches, dogs help raise bacteria levels so high that visitors
must stay out of the water. Goaded by such studies, some cities have
directed as much as $10,000 in the last few years to encourage dog
owners to clean up after their pets. A few municipalities have started
issuing citations to those who ignore pet clean-up ordinances.
Many dog lovers are in denial about their pooches' leavings. But
researchers have named the idea that areas used by dogs pump more
bacteria into waterways — the "Fido hypothesis."
Dogs are only one of many fixtures of suburban America that add
to water pollution. Lawn fertilizers, rinse water from driveways
and motor oil commonly end up in streams and lakes.
But unlike those sources, dogs generate disease-causing bacteria
that can make people sick. Studies done in the last few years put
dogs third or fourth on the list of contributors to bacteria in contaminated
waters. "Dogs are one of our usual suspects," says Valerie
Harwood, a microbiologist at the University of South Florida. "At
certain sites, we find their effect to be significant."
It doesn't take a Ph.D. to figure out that dog do is nasty. But
it took science to determine how nasty it is.
From mutt to blue-blooded champion, all dogs harbor so-called coliform
bacteria, which live in the gut. The group includes E. coli, a bacterium
that can cause disease, and fecal coliform bacteria, which spread
through feces. Dogs also carry salmonella and giardia. Environmental
officials use measurements of some of these bacteria as barometers
of how much fecal matter has contaminated a body of water.
This wouldn't matter if pet dogs were as rare as pet chinchillas.
But four in 10 U.S. households include at least one dog, according
to the American Pet Products Manufacturers Association. The association's
statistics also show that Americans owned 54.6 million dogs in 1996
and 68 million dogs in 2000. Of that total, 45% were "large" dogs — 40
pounds or more.
Those numbers add up to a lot of kibble. That wouldn't matter if
all dog owners also owned a pooper-scooper. But several studies have
found that roughly 40% of Americans don't pick up their dogs' feces
(women are more likely to do so than men).
New analysis provides answers.
The environmental impact of dog waste
went unrecognized for decades. Then scientists
developed lab techniques to determine the
origin of fecal bacteria contaminating water.
One method is a variant of DNA fingerprinting. Another method looks
at the antibiotic resistance of microbes from different species.
Scientists caution that the methods are still
new.
They are able
to distinguish between major and minor sources of pollution, but
they can't say with precision whether dogs contribute 20% or 30%
of the pollution in a stream. "There's inherently some error," says
Don Stoeckel, a microbiologist for the Ohio district of the U.S.
Geological Survey who's studying bacteria-tracking methods. "I
think the best (they) can do is give you some evidence of the magnitude
of each source."
Nonetheless, Stoeckel says, the analytical tools do provide useful
information. Researchers have studied dozens of waterways. Wild birds
and humans usually head the roster of who's fouling the water. But
in some areas, dogs make significant deposits.
At Morro Bay, Calif., for example, dogs contribute roughly 10% of
the E. coli, says Christopher Kitts, a microbiologist at California
Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo. "And that can
be the difference between a beach closing and a beach not closing," he
says.
Places where dogs dirty the water:
• Stevenson Creek in Clearwater, Fla. Residents were worried that a sewage
treatment plant contaminated the creek. But when Harwood tested the water, she
found that dogs, along with leaky septic tanks and wild animals, were to blame
for high bacteria counts. Dog feces probably washed out of yards by the creek,
Harwood says.
• Four Mile Run in Arlington and Fairfax counties, Va. Studies show that
dogs add to the contamination in this suburban Washington, D.C. stream. Officials
calculate that the 12,000 dogs living in Four Mile Run's watershed leave behind
more than 5,000 pounds of "solid waste" every day.
• Boise River in Boise. The river suffers from high bacteria levels that
make it unsuitable for swimming. Testing of streams and drainpipes flowing into
the river showed that in urban areas, dogs were a leading culprit. In some spots,
dogs and cats account for even more of the bacteria than human feces — from
dysfunctional septic tanks and leaky sewage pipes — do.
Fines don't sway some. Even where dogs aren't the prime offenders,
they're one of the few polluters authorities
have control over. At many California beaches,
for example, seagulls and other birds are most responsible for high
bacteria levels. But federal laws protect birds.
That leaves dogs. Officials know that they have a lot of educating
to do before people realize their pooch can be a canine sewage pipe.
Some people find it humiliating to carry a plastic bag.
A survey by the Center for Watershed Protection in 1999 found that
of the 41% of respondents who rarely or never clean up after their
dogs, 44% would refuse to do so in the face of fines and neighbors'
complaints. Reasons included, "because it eventually goes away," "small
dog, small waste," and "just because."
So more cities may follow the lead of Laguna Beach, Calif., a wealthy
beach enclave. The city provides pooper-scoopers at the local dog
park. But many people "don't take care of their little friends," says
Victor Hillstead, the city's parks and buildings manager.